Introduction
Nowadays, the
focus of the Ontario educational system is improved. Schools are looking
forward to a better performance in both academic and social aspects; school
boards are expecting a greater outcome from the educational institutions in
their districts; students and parents have never stopped looking for a school
providing comprehension development. In a word, the whole educational system of
Ontario is moving forward sustainably. However, improvement needs energy. Sustainable
improvement needs sustainable energy that can be converted into human and
material resources (Hargreaves& Fink, 2007). Through the visits to the secondary
schools in Niagara region, the developmental potential of the education shows
incisively and vividly. There were four secondary schools visited by us in
November: Eden High School, St. Francis Secondary School, St. Catharines
Collegiate School, and Blessed Trinity
Catholic Secondary School. In this paper, three of them will be picked to compare
and evaluated: Eden High School, St. Francis Secondary School, and St.
Catharines Collegiate School, because of that all three schools represent
different form of school existing in Ontario: Public School, Catholic School,
and Public Christian School. Afterward, such educational representatives of
Ontario will be compared with the educational system in China in several
aspects. Furthermore, an overview of eastern and western education will be
stated at the end.
A general evaluation of
schools
First of all, I
am really glad to obtain the chance of obvious the Canadian schooling system
internally. All the schools we have visited are elites in their specific educational
area. For instance, the St. Francis Secondary School is a marvelous Catholic
school in the school district. St. Francis locates nearby Niagara Lake shore. Because
of the area is settled by the middle and upper class families, the
constructions of the school are well built and decorated. As a fact, he
students at St. Francis are mainly from the middle class and upper class result
in that the school contains good manner and order. Generally speaking, the
first impression of St. Francis is the heavily cultural atmosphere. The school
daily schedule consists of numerous cultural activities and traditional events.
Plenty of religious symbols and pictures, the memento of annual events and
activities displayed in the well decorated hall. In addition, the strongest
characteristic of the school prided by administrators is that school has a very
strict discipline to keep it in great order. For example, Uniforms and specific
kind of shoes are necessary to be worn on campus. What else, the tattoos and accessories
like earrings are abandoned by the regulation of the school. During the visit,
we can easily feel the peaceful and organized climate of the St. Francis. Moreover,
another impressive factor is the technology and equipment for the school. From
smart board, visual communication system in the classroom, to workshop,
mechanical factor, musical classroom and even media center, the school contains
almost every single top technology that could be utilized in education. As a
result, the capacity of the student is amazing by the various choices of
self-interest based courses. In fact, it seems the biggest difference between
eastern and western education which will be discussed in later parts. Last but not the least, the special education
of St. Francis is fabulous. Special students in this school are treated very
considerately and carefully. There are several levels to separate different
degree of their disabilities. Some of them are able to involve into normal
classes with their own teaching assistants. Another group of special students is
arranged in resources classes with supports of extra resources for their study.
And the rest which cannot proceed regular studies are looked after carefully in
the special classes. By the thoughtful consideration and treatment, the special
students can experience the best study climate they can ever have.
When you step
into the school gate of Eden high school, you can surely smell the difference
from other schools. As mentioned before, Eden High School is a Public Christian
School. Normally, the religious school is not allowed to become a part of the
district of the school board. As a special case, Eden is a Christian school; however,
it is still not allowed to proceed religious activities in school time. Same as
St. Francis High School, Eden High School has a strict discipline as well. A
vivid evidence is that two students got a three day suspension because of
walking while national song. The suspension is extremely serious to us, and it
is impossible in China only by violating certain rule. Nevertheless, such
punishments are kind of success as well because of being a part of moral
leadership. According to Sergiovanni (1975), many school administrators are
practicing a form of leadership that is based on moral authority, and such
practice should be acknowledged as leadership. The administrators of Eden do
successfully build a mutual respective relationship through the school wide by
setting certain regulations and taking it seriously. As another expression of
moral leadership, spiritual department is a core component of Eden’s
educational system. This department mainly focuses on the mental health of the
student. Besides, all off-school religious activities for students and teachers
are held by spiritual department, it consequently regarded as an important agency
to maintain symbols of Christian school. In addition, another impression in
Eden is the patrolling police officer on campus. The principal Mr. Thompson
explained that settling police in school can avoid bullying behavior from
students. However, it can also be explained as an extreme way to keep the order
in the school. Although it might secure the social equity on campus, student
still could feel uncomfortable about being observed by police, like prisoners.
Due to the great scale of the school and
the lovingly reception, we spent the most time in St. Catharines Collegiate high
school, hence the information from this school is much more than provided by
other schools. During our school tour, we observed the difficulties of
organizing such a big educational institution. For instance, a boy was lying randomly
under the stair and seems very sick. When the vice principal asked him about
the reason, he just paltered him with the reason of not feeling comfortable.
The biggest impression of the school is that the school provided us a fancy lunch
which made by special student. Such activities show another kind of
consideration to those special students that differ from schools above. The
philosophy of special education in Collegiate is that they are not only taking
care of the students but also looking forward to creating a better future for
them. After having lunch at school, I went to watch a basketball game between
Collegiate school team and Grimsby school team due to the heavy rain outside. As
a fact, the enthusiasm of students for sports was
really impressed me. The sports team for Canadian schools is far beyond
only a competitive group but a representative of school culture. According to
my own experience, since once I have played basketball for my school team,
although the sports team in Chinese school can occupy school time for training
and contesting, it still is isolated from rest parts of the school. Students are
never allowed to dodge classes for watching games of their own school. To be
frank, such impression gave me a sense of humanistic concern in Canadian schools;
it is not about academic excellence, but the sense of collectivism.
Lastly, all three schools will be
compared generally and systematically by using the professor Sydor’s “Four
Leadership Frames” theory and Dr. Larry Lezotte’s “Correlates of School
Improvement.
|
Eden High Christian
public school Trinity
|
St. Catharines
Collegiate
|
St. Francis high
school
|
|
STRUCTURAL
FRAMES
|
Students
Appearance
|
· Religious students, uniformed,
well organized by strict disciplines and police
|
· Minorities and new immigrants,
dress sloppily and poorly, behave desultorily and unconcernedly
|
· Mainly
white students, Uniformed, well organized by strict disciplines
|
Teachers
Appearance
|
· Teachers look very
professional, dress in a casual formal style, has a positive interaction with
their students
|
· Teachers look tired and unconfident,
dress casually, bare have interaction with students
|
· Teachers
look very professional, dress formally, has positive interaction and various
activities in class
|
|
Class
Scale and Discipline
|
· Various Classes available to
students, students are concentrating and active based on their own interest
|
· Transmitting based classes,
students seem to be abstracted
· School discipline shows in
front of every classroom
|
· Students are organized by
course and the teacher not class, generally small classes
· Students’ interest and ability
are well developed
|
|
School
Order
|
· Hardware: classroom equipped with updated technics, hand work workshops,
mechanical factory and art rooms;
· Environment: school building is new, clean and neat, all in good order
· School Uniform: students all dressed in uniform
|
· Hardware: classroom equipments are old and outdated, no sensory room at
school, a big library and huge auditorium
· Environment: school building is big but old, not very clean nor neat
· School Uniform: the only public school with uniform
|
· Hardware: classroom well equipped, advanced electric equipments are utilized,
independent resource room, workshops and media rooms.
· Environment: school building fulfills new and clean of cultural elements
· School Uniform: students all dressed in uniform
|
|
HUMAN
RESOURCE
FRAMES
|
Principal
Leadership
Style
|
Male.
· Efficient, and professional
principal with consideration for students
· The principal works closely
with teachers and students
· Strong moral leadership
|
Female
· Very kind, responsible but not
professional enough, invitational leadership style
· The vice principal seems to be
unfamiliar with the school facilities and students, she said she is a
newcomer
|
Male
Efficient, care about all students.
Little bit bureaucratic, lack of
communication with us
|
Teacher-Student
Relationship
|
· Seems limited
· Students are well organized by
the teachers
· Lack of information
|
· Standard, seems like lack of
cooperation
|
· Good, positive interaction
with each other, students show respect to teachers and teachers seem to care
about students
|
|
Others
|
· School council is very effective
because parents are pleased to be getting involved in school activities
|
· School gets 5000 hours
volunteer services per year from the community
|
·
|
|
SYMBOLIC
FRAMES
|
Non-Religion
|
· School history display board,
school trophy show box, and students’ decorations are neat and beautiful
showing that the school is under good management
|
· A board on the wall showing
the history of the school at the front door
· Colorful decoration paintings
on the wall in lobby and hallways
|
· School history display board,
school trophy show box, and students’ decorations are neat and beautiful
· Elements show the
characteristics of the school
|
Religion
|
· Numerous cross, religious
portrait and symbols infiltrate into every corner of the school
· Photo frames of the Pope and
the Primate and cross in the lobby
· Students-painting crosses
· Morning prayer
|
· None
|
· Not too many symbols of
religion, but the school still shows their Christian religion by several
aspects
|
Comparison between Chinese and Canadian educational
system
Leaders
through their ways of mandating to approach their vision of schools. Whatever
decisions they make, ways they choose to implement educational improvement,
they will "tap people's emotions, appeal their values, and respond to
their connections with other people" (Sergiovanni, 1992, p. 76). There is
a morally based leadership-- a form of stewardship, that emerged in the late 20th
century (Sergiovanni, 1992). In stewardship, school leaders, administers,
teachers, and parents share their ideas and values, more importantly,
responsibilities for students' learning. Students are also a part of this
leadership, "they join the others in stewardship responsibility for the
school as learning community" (Sergiovanni, 1992, p. 91). As Sergiovanni
comments,
Stewardship represents primarily an act of trust,
whereby people and institutions entrust a leader with certain obligations and
duties to fulfill and perform on their behalf. For example, the public entrusts
the schools to the school board. The school board entrusts each school to its
principal, parents entrust their children to teachers. ... Stewardship involves
placing oneself I service to ideas and ideas and to others who are committed to
their fulfillment. It furnishes an attractive image of leadership. (p. 91)
During
the school visiting, the principals all mentioned about how their communities
contributed to the school, how the parents involve themselves in the school
event and help schools establish programs. They are not only proud of their
staff and teachers but the bigger environment they live in. School, community,
parent, and student are interrelated in terms of building a more effective
learning environment. In China, they have a top to down hierarchy relationship.
A community is much less likely involved in students' learning. Parents' job is
to obey what the school tells them to do in terms of students' assignments and
then monitor their children to finish. Instead of cultivating multiple
abilities, schools in China focus on the students' successfulness of exams. As
a result, the cognitions of students' learning orientation, self-awareness, and
social obligation are low. This stewardship starts to emerge in private schools
in some big cities, such as Shanghai, Beijing, and so on. But it is still a
tough way to persist and implement it in the exam-focused school culture.
Generally
speaking, the educational system in Ontario province is far ahead of most
educational systems in the world, including Chinese and American. Based on the
organizational theories, the educational organizational structure is moving
steadily forward to a learning organization model; meanwhile, the Chinese
education is still struggling between bureaucracy and modified bureaucracy. Although
there are increasing educational leaders in China who start to care about more
than the result of examinations. The whole society in China including educator
student and parent is still putting the academic excellence on priority. The
power of decision making in schooling system is impossibly distributed into
lower levels of the educational structure. The student and parent are still
located on the bottom of the whole educational pyramid. Besides, the so-called
educational reform in china is mainly based on quality oriented education,
which focuses on providing multiple developmental directions to students and
distributing the right of decision making into student and parent level. However,
all Chinese educational institutions are still directed by the syllabus
formulated by the government, and the result of examinations that based on such
syllabus is still the only way to evaluate the outcome of education. Therefore,
the education in China could possibly improve only if the Chinese educational system
could be restructured by entire society according to the real purpose of the
quality oriented education. In a word, pyramid organizational construction of
education should be eliminated.
As another fact,
overwhelmingly more Chinese schools start importing “invitational education”
into their classes. Nevertheless, the invitational education is based on Dewey’s
educational theory, constructivism, which was abandoned by Chinese government
several decades ago. However, the current Chinese educational system is simply referring
to the successful outcome of western education reform and ignoring the basis of
such revaluation. Like a bomb without blasting fuse, you cannot control the
timing and power; like a skyscraper without groundwork, you cannot direct the
construction growing straightly and solidly. It could definitely lead a
disaster for our educational system without a bright correction. The original
purpose of invitational education is inviting students to develop themselves
initially. On the contrary, the misunderstanding invitational education will
possibly mislead into a dead loop. In order to really apply advanced western
educational theories into Chinese environment, the administrators and leaders
must realize that simply importing part of the system can no longer work in the
current situation. The barycenter of education must be transferred from
exam-oriented to student-centered. Besides, the government should lay the
educational pyramid down and truly distribute the power into different levels. Although
the government and educational department could still work as a leader of the
whole system, providing the direction and adjusting the deviation, the mutual
respect and interaction are still the foundation of the advanced learning organization.
Finally, to quote from Albert Einstein, We cannot solve the problems that we
have created with the same thinking that created them.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
we are really pleased to have the chance of visiting those preeminent schools
in Niagara region. Such experience provides a general vision of the Canadian
educational system to us. As a part of graduate study, this kind of applicable
course, offers students not only general knowledge but also applications into
real educational institutions, the principle of teaching in Canada could easily
explain by such activities. In the end, the useful experiences and precious
memories will be definitely recorded in my path of educational career.
Reference:
Hargreaves, A., Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable
leadership. John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral
leadership. The Jossey-bass reader on educational leadership (2nd. Ed.).
Pp. 75-92.
No comments:
Post a Comment